Scientific Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology

Scientific Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology

Assessment of geomechanical properties of rock masses for preliminary support design of diversion tunnel at the Daroongar dam site

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Professor, Department of Geology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
2 2. Professor, Department of Geology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
3 PhD student, Department of Geology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
 
This paper presents the geomechanical parameters and the results of preliminary support design of the Daroongar diversion tunnel using some empirical and numerical methods. The rock mass rating (RMR), geological strength index (GSI) and rock mass quality (Q) systems were used for estimation of quality of rock masses properties for preliminary support design of tunnel. Also distinct element method (UDEC program) was used for stability analysis of the tunnel. Samples obtained from drilling were tested in the laboratory, included of uniaxial strength (UCS), deformation parameters, unit weight and porosity. In order to estimate strength parameters of rock mass (compressive strength of rock masses, tensile strength of rock masses, deformation modulus and Hoek-Brown constants) Hoek-Brown failure criterion was used.
Keywords
Subjects

Barton, N.  (2002). Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39, pp. 185–216.
Barton, N.R., Lien, R. and Lunde, J. (1974). Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech. 6, 189-236.
Bieniawski, Z.T. (1989). Engineering rock mass classifications, Wiley, New York, 251p.
Cai, M., Kaiser, P.K., Uno, H., Tasaka, Y., Minami, M., (2004). Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41, 3-19
Deere, D.U. and Miller, R.P. (1966). Engineering classification and index properties of rock. Technical Report No. AFNL-TR-65-116. Albuquerque, NM: Air Force Weapons Laboratory.
Diederichs, M.S., Hoek, E. (1989). DIPS 2.2. Advanced Version Computer Programme, Rock Engineering Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto.
Grimstad, E. and Barton, N. (1993). Updating the Q-System for NMT. Proc. Int. Symp. on Sprayed Concrete - modern Use of Wet Mix Sprayed Concrete for Underground Support, Fagernes, (eds Kompen, Opsahl and Berg). Oslo: Norwegian Concrete Assn.
Gurocak, Z., Solanki, P. and Zaman, M. M. (2007). Empirical and numerical analyses of support requirements for a diversion tunnel at the Boztepe dam site, eastern Turkey, Engineering Geology, 91, pp. 194–208
Hoek, E. and Diederichs, M.S., (2006). Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 43,  pp. 203–215.
Hoek, E., (2000). Rock Engineering. Course Notes by Evert Hoek. Balkema, Rotterdam. 313 p.
Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C.T., and Corkum, B. (2002). Hoek-Brown failure criterion –2002 edition. Proc. North American Rock Mechanics Society Meeting in Toronto.
Hoek, E., Kaiser, P.K. and Bawden, W.F. (1995). Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock. Balkema, Rotterdam, 215p.
Hoek, E., Marinos, P. and Benissi, M. (1998). Applicability of the Geological Strength Index (GSI) classification for very weak and sheared rock masses. The case of the Athens Schist Formation. Bull.  Engg.  Geol.  Env.  57, 151-160.
ISRM (1981). Suggested Methods for the Quantitative Description of Discontinuities in Rock Masses. Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring, London. Pergamon, Oxford, 221 p.
ITASCA. (2000). Universal distinct element code, Version 3.1, User's manual. ITASCA Consulting Group, Inc., USA.
Ramamurthy, T. (2004). A geo-engineering classification for rocks and rock masses, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 41, pp. 89–101.
 
 
 
Volume 1, Issue 2
September 2008
Pages 1-14

  • Receive Date 27 May 2007
  • Revise Date 19 March 2008
  • Accept Date 22 October 2008