Scientific Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology

Scientific Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology

An investigation on the seismicity of Iran seismotectonic provinces using Monte Carlo simulation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Rock Mechanics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran-Iran
2 استادیار مهندسی مکانیک سنگ، دانشگاه صنعتی همدان
3 دانشجوی دکتری مهندسی معدن، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود
Abstract
Empirical relationships between earthquake magnitude and frequency of occurrence, e.g. Gutenberg - Richter’s relationship, have been presented for a special region using limited historical data. These relationships usually involve many sources of uncertainty (frequency of occurrence, magnitude, etc.). Therefore, it is necessary to use probabilistic simulation for determination of earthquake occurrence frequency instead of the deterministic one. In the present, Monte Carlo simulation, as the most preferred approach for probabilistic simulation, is used to evaluate seismic potential of Iran provinces. On the basis of probabilistic analyses, the frequency of earthquake occurrence by assuming a normal distribution of magnitudes and different occurrence probability are determined for 20 seismotectonic provinces of Iran. Furthermore, it can be concluded that the province situated in southwest of Iran (i.e. region number 12) is the most seismically active region and province number 16 (situated in the northwest of Iran) is the least seismically active region of Iran.
Keywords
Subjects

برگی، خ.ف.، 1379. اصول مهندسی زلزله. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
شکری قصبه، م.، بخشیانی ع. و مفید م.، 1386. تحلیل ریسک وقوع زلزله در پروژه‌های ساخت برای نقاط مختلف ایران با استفاده از رگرسیون‌های درجه دوم GLS و کمک از تست‌های آماری و مدل آماری پواسن. فصلنامه­ی علمی پژوهشی شریف، شمارة 40،ص.17-13.
Abercrombie, R.E., 1996. The magnitude-frequency distribution of earthquake records with deep seismometers at Cajon Pass, southern California. Tectonophysics, 261: 1-7.
Akinci, A., Perkins, D, Lombardi, A.M., Basili, R., 2010. Uncertainties in probability of occurrence of strong earthquakes for fault sources in the Central Apennines, Italy. Journal of Seismology, 14:95–117
Day, R.W., 2002. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Handbook. McGraw-Hill Companies,
Fischer, T., Alvarez, M., De la Llera, J.C., Riddell, R., 2002. An integrated model for earthquake risk assessment of buildings. Engineering Structures, 24: 979–998.
Gutenberg, B., Richter C.F., 1944. Frequency of earthquake in California. Bullettin of Seismolology Society of America, 72: 1867-1879.
Kaila, K.L., Narian, H, 1971. A new approach for the preparation of quantitative seismicity maps, Bullettin of Seismolology Society of America, 61(5): 1275-91
Kramer, S.L., 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Krinitzsky, E.L., 2002. How to Obtain Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Design. Engineering Geology, 65: 1-16.
Mirzaei, N., Gao, M., Chen, Y.T., 1998. Seismic source regionalization for seismic zoning of Iran: major seismotectonic provinces. Journal of Earthquake Prediction Research, 7: 465-495.
Nowroozi, A., 1976. Seismotectonic Provinces of Iran, Bullettin of Seismolology Society of America, 66, 1249-1276.
Reiter, L., 1990. Earthquake Hazard Analysis - Issues and Insights. Columbia University Press, New York,
Tavakoli, B., Ghafoori Ashtiany, M., 2002. Seismic hazard assessment of Iran. Available in: WWW.IIEES.com
Weatherill, G., Burton, P.W., 2010. An alternative approach to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis in the Aegean region using Monte Carlo simulation. Tectonophysics, 492: 253–278.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Volume 5, Number 1 & 2
September 2012
Pages 59-68

  • Receive Date 05 March 2011
  • Revise Date 19 March 2012
  • Accept Date 22 August 2012