Scientific Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology

Scientific Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology

Estimation of Safe Charge per Delay in Bench Blastıng

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Mining Engineering Urmia University of Technology
2 Faculty of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, P.O. Box 57166-17165, Iran
Abstract
Prediction of maximum safe charge per delay (Q , kg) by Distance (D) from blasting point and adaptive Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) is a critical key for successful blasting. Safe charge per delay is calculated by using PPV estimators indirectly or Q estimator directly. This paper presents the results of ground vibration measurement induced by bench blasting in Sungun copper mine. The scope of this study is to evaluate the capability of different methods in order to predict maximum safe charge per delay. Conventional empirical models and two type of new non-linear dirict estimator models are prsented. An application of Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) has used to determine the Q estimator coefficients in Sungun bench blasting. A comparison between two ways of investigations including conventional empirical equations and ICA are done. It has been shown that the applicability of ICA-based equations is more promising than any selected traditional empirical equations.
Keywords

Alipour, A., Ashtiani, M., 2011. Fuzzy modeling approaches for the prediction of maximum charge per delay in surface mining. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 48(2): 305-310.
Alipour, A., Mokharian, M., Chehreghani, S., 2018. An Application of Fuzzy Sets to the Blastability Index (BI) Used in Rock Engineering. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 62(3): 580-589.
Alipour, A., Mokhtarian, M., Abdollahei Sharif, J., 2012. Artificial neural network or empirical criteria? A comparative approach in evaluating maximum charge per delay in surface mining — Sungun copper mine. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 79(6): 652-658.
Ambraseys, N., Hendron, A., 1968. Dynamic behavior of rock masses in rock mechanics in engineering practice (KG Stagg & OC Zienkievicz, Eds.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Ardalan, Z., Karimi, S., Poursabzi, O., Naderi, B., 2015. A novel imperialist competitive algorithm for generalized traveling salesman problems. Applied Soft Computing, 26: 546-555.
Atashpaz-Gargari, E., Lucas, C., 2007a. Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition, Evolutionary computation, 2007. CEC 2007. IEEE Congress on. IEEE, pp. 4661-4667.
Atashpaz-Gargari, E., Lucas, C., 2007b. Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition, 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 4661-4667.
Behnamian, J., Zandieh, M., 2011. A discrete colonial competitive algorithm for hybrid flowshop scheduling to minimize earliness and quadratic tardiness penalties. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12): 14490-14498.
Dowding, C.H., 1992. Suggested method for blast vibration monitoring. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 29(2): 145-156.
Duvall, W.I., Fogelson, D.E., 1962. Review of criteria for estimating damage to residences from blasting vibrations. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines.
Hossaini, M., Sen, G.C., 2006. A Study of the Influence of Different Blasting Modes and Explosive Types on Ground Vibrations. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, 30(B3): 313-325.
Hossaini, S., Sen, G., 2004. Effect of explosive type on particle velocity criteria in ground vibration. Journal of Explosives Engineering, 21(4): 34-36.
Hosseinzadeh Gharehgheshlagh, H., Alipour, A., 2020. Ground vibration due to blasting in dam and hydropower projects. Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik (The Mining-Geological-Petroleum Bulletin), 35(3).
Hudaverdi, T., Akyildiz, O., 2017. Investigation of the site-specific character of blast vibration prediction. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(3): 138.
Khandelwal, M., Singh, T.N., 2009. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural network. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46(7): 1214-1222.
Khandelwal, M., Singh, T.N., 2013. Application of an Expert System to Predict Maximum Explosive Charge Used Per Delay in Surface Mining. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 46(6): 1551-1558.
Koçaslan, A., Yüksek, A.G., Görgülü, K., Arpaz, E., 2017. Evaluation of blast-induced ground vibrations in open-pit mines by using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(1): 57.
Kumar, R., Choudhury, D., Bhargava, K., 2016. Determination of blast-induced ground vibration equations for rocks using mechanical and geological properties. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 8(3): 341-349.
Langefors, U., Kihlstrom, B., 1978. The Modern Science of Rock Blasting. Almqyist & Wiksell.
Lian, K., Zhang, C., Gao, L., Shao, X., 2012. A modified colonial competitive algorithm for the mixed-model U-line balancing and sequencing problem. International Journal of Production Research, 50(18): 5117-5131.
Mokhtarian Asl, M., Alipour, A., 2020. A nonlinear model to estimate vibration frequencies in surface mines. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering, 54(2): 167-171.
Parsaei, M., 2010. Geomechanic and stability conditions analysis of the sungun copper mine's rock mass by numerical modeling. Journal of Earth and Resources, 3(3 (8)): -.
Rai, R., Shrivastva, B.K., Singh, T.N., 2005. Prediction of maximum safe charge per delay in surface mining. Mining Technology, 114(4): 227-231.
Sadaei, H.J., Enayatifar, R., Lee, M.H., Mahmud, M., 2016. A hybrid model based on differential fuzzy logic relationships and imperialist competitive algorithm for stock market forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 40: 132-149.
Sharifi, M.A., Mojallali, H., 2015. A modified imperialist competitive algorithm for digital IIR filter design, 2015 The International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP), pp. 7-12.

  • Receive Date 25 November 2020
  • Revise Date 29 May 2021
  • Accept Date 17 July 2021