New method for selecting the location of additional drillings based on indicator kriging; case study Semilan dam

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD candidate, School of Mining Engineering. University of Tehran

2 Professor of Geo-Engineering, School of Mining Engineering. University of Tehran,

Abstract

Defining indicator is used for classification of data, based on a threshold and converting qualitative to quantitative data. One of the applications of the indicatoring in estimation is indicator kriging. In the present study, two geotechnical parameters (Lugeon and RQD) from 27 boreholes, along with various structures of the Semilan dam were studied. Based on indicator functions, Lugeon parameter divided to four, RQD to three and various structures of the dam site to four indexes. Then, indicator variogram of each parameter was calculated and their variogram characteristics were extracted. The geotechnical parameters were estimated, by 3D kriging. Based on the average of kriging error (Lugeon and RQD) were also divided into four indexes. The function to locate additional drillings is based on maximizing parameters such as Lugeon, average of error estimation and index of dam structures; and minimizing RQD. The function to locate additional drillings is found by dividing the result of multiplying Lugeon, estimation error, and index of dam structures, by RQD. In this paper, based on the function of additional drilling locations, two extra boreholes were suggested for the studied dam site. It should be noted that new boreholes in early stage of drillings can more effectively reduces error estimation, compare to those drilled in the later stages. Hence, although adding two boreholes to 27 existing boreholes of Semilan dam cannot considerably decrease the error estimation, but effectively decrease the uncertainty around them.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Blackwell G. (1998) Relative kriging errors: a basis for mineral resource classification. Exploration Mining Geology, No. 7, p. 99-105.
Clayton C.R., Matthews M.C., Simons N.E. (1995) Site investigation: a handbook for engineers. Blackwell, Oxford.
Gossage B. (1998) The application of indicator kriging in the modeling of geological data. Proceedings of a one day symposium: Beyond ordinary kriging. October 30th, PerthWestern Australia. Geostatistical Association of Australasia.
Hassanipak A.A., Sharafodin M. (2004) GET: a function for preferential site selection of additional borehole drilling, Exploration and  Mining Geology, No. 13(1-4), pp. 139 - 146.
Knudsen H. P., Baafi, E.Y. (1987) Indicator kriging and other new geostatistical tools. Proceedings of the Pacific Rim Congress, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp. 859-864.
Myers J.C. (1997). Geostatistical Error Management: Quantifying Uncertainty for Environmental Sampling and Mapping, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Webster R., Margaret A. (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists, Wiley.
Wingle W.L. (1997) Evaluating subsurface uncertainty using modified geostatistical techniques, PhD thesis of Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines.
 
 
 
Scientific Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology
Volume 1, Number 3 & 4
March 2008
Pages 45-58

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 October 2009
  • Revise Date: 27 December 2009
  • Accept Date: 24 February 2010

Share

How to cite

Statistics